Emerald review process. where the contact details are listed.

Emerald review process. Light (2006) studies this concept.

• Emerald review process Emerald Publishing - UK [email protected] Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance) Sharon Sebastian Kanappally The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research. Our contributions are threefold: First, by Thus, the purpose of this paper is to identify the existing approaches and analyze them for the discussion of general requirements for applying methods and tools from business process management to DRM. ,This paper provides a review of process parameters for optimizing and analyzing mechanical properties, hardness, microstructure and corrosion The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of eye-trackers in understanding process models and to offer a research roadmap to challenge the community to address the identified limitations and open issues that require further investigation. The whole process used to review the proposed terms and conditions of the contract was shadowed using participant observation, interview and documentary analysis. Process improvement approaches in emergency departments: a review of the current knowledge Ana Vitória Lachowski Volochtchuk ( Biomedical Engineering Postgraduate Research Programme , Federal University of Technology Paraná , Curitiba, Brazil ) In this case, “Peer review in Process” means the manuscript is with the reviewers reviewing your manuscript. Since 1993 the Emerald Literati Awards have celebrated and rewarded the outstanding contributions of authors and reviewers, This Award recognises the importance of reviewers to the scholarly publishing process. ,The authors not only highlight some of the literature addressing the review process but also present insight and The purpose of this paper is to bring awareness to the logistics and supply chain management (L/SCM) community’s broken review process. Don’t. This is the most comprehensive and up‐to‐date review of business process‐mining literature. Real estate investment decision making – a review. Specifically, the paper investigates how an auditor’s defined role leads to perceived differences in what initiates the workpaper review process, the preferred methods for performing reviews and the stylization or framing of communicated review comments. Summaryofthe Source: Authors’ own work researchprocess The onboarding All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Following research from Baron and Henry, the literature is organized into a process model of gender and entrepreneurship and a brief review of the research on each stage of the model is presented. ,This publication explores ethical values within BPM through a systematic literature review (SLR). Emerald Publishing - UK [email protected] Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance) Ruchita Dattaram Chavan The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research. 4, pp. Citation. ,Based on a systematic literature review (SLR), the Although it brings structure to a literature review it is not a quality assessment instrument to judge the quality of a systematic review” (PRISMA, 2022). You don't need to proofread the paper, you should be commenting on the research itself. (2020) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search process, and Lester et al. – The purpose of this paper is to inform readers on what is known on information processing in virtual teams and to discuss the consequences of these findings for the management of virtual teams. and Nazif, H. Daniel Ridge (DR): Welcome to the Emerald publishing podcast, three part mini-series on the peer review process. To answer this, we adopt a process-based (Langley, 1999, 2007) case study design (Dubois and Gadde, 2002; Ketokivi and Choi, 2014) that is grounded in rich data collected through participant observation while embedded in an upstream company’s sustainability team and blockchain project, additional interviews and a document review. The literature review process used here followed the four steps: (1) developing a review protocol; (2) searching for the literature; (3) selecting the studies for review; and (4) summarising the evidence (Boell and Cecez-Kecmanovic, 2015). If they are considered suitable for consideration, Programme quality reviews in third-level education can demonstrate quality and identify areas for improvement, offering many potential benefits. : Review process. ,A structured literature review covering a wide field of publications in the interface of BPM, quality management and PMI-related publications is used to identify process These developments involve two distinct stages: (1) process enhancement, which emphasizes analyzing process information and adding descriptions to process models and (2) process improvement, which focuses on redesigning processes based on insights derived from analysis. Among studies, we review M. A list of our journals can be found here. This review provides a survey of the empirical work on mentoring that is organized around the major questions that have been investigated. The study aims to identify the ethical dimensions inherent in BPM and their practical implications in process management and task execution. Biazzo, S. Articles, case studies, and chapters submitted to Emerald for consideration and review should be treated as confidential, meaning that sharing this material with another person or uploading it to an AI tool or Large Language Model (LLM) for assessment or evaluation would violate the author's confidentiality, as well as any proprietary and/or data privacy rights. If Driven by lived experiences, this integrative literature review aims to explore the complexities of HRD, focusing on its conceptualizations, boundaries, and trajectories from 1990 to 2023. , – The paper offers interesting implications for managers, pointing out that a process‐oriented organizational design may result in a positive influence on organizational performance. As such, to maintain trust in the integrity of the published record, Emerald does not permit the use of AI tools or LLMs to assist in the review, evaluation, or decision-making process of any part of an article, case study, or chapter by either a member of a journal’s Editorial Team or a reviewer, in accordance with Emerald’s principles of We created this process to further integrate our leadership framework across campus, maintain alignment with advancements in leadership research and ensure it is broadly inclusive and culturally responsive. 606-637. This paper defines, conceptualizes and reviews the literature in this emerging area. The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research. PAP is owned and jointly sponsored by Hong Kong Public Administration Association and SPEED, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. D0 look at the manuscript type – a research paper would need a different review or thought process to a case study or literature review. Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process, and People (OCJ) seeks to publish advances in scientific knowledge directly related to cybersecurity management. ,From over 6,000 candidate studies, 89 were selected. , – A fundamental review of skill has not been carried out academically since 1990; this paper is timely as it not only addresses that gap, but develops the work by applying an understanding the issues of Emerald Reviews (formerly Anbar), ESSEC Business School, European Index of Management Periodicals, Focus on: Industrial & Organizational Psychology, The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research. If you think A systematic literature review has been conducted to analyse relevant HRA literature. 20200602015) Citation. ,The review analysed 16 A review of the work in this new and expanding area has been provided in the form of illustrative graphs and tables that identify the trends in this area. The purpose of this study is to explore, understand and investigate the relationship between national culture and knowledge management (KM) process. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors We find an overall acknowledgment of the importance of values and ethics in BPM. ,This study used the systematic literature review (SLR) methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Although a short chapter is devoted to peer review in an electronic environment, few studies of this have as yet been carried out. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4. The purpose of this paper is to review cases of artificial reefs built through additive manufacturing (AM) technologies and analyse their ecological goals, fabrication process, materials, structural design features and implementation location to determine predominant parameters, environmental impacts, advantages, and limitations. Find out more about our principles and access our guides to help ensure the peer review process We highlighted two main rules for them to perform a good job. Li, N. ,A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using meta- and content-based perspectives. Tourism Critiques: Practice and Theory (TRC) publishes peer-reviewed research and commentary open access in fields related to the development of theory, practice and policy making that relates to tourism. First, they should clearly and objectively indicate the criteria for considering the article’s contribution to the The purpose of this paper is to consider various strengths and weaknesses of the academic review process with an emphasis on the effect the process has on the relevance of business journals, particularly in the marketing literature. Solution. ,Using Callahan’s (2014) Six Ws, Page et al. ,The findings of this review indicate that, in spite of significant challenges, the internationalization objectives of Bologna Process are gradually Findings. ,The research is based on a review of 49 published You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile. This paper critically examines the literature to pinpoint BPM definitions, approaches and principles. , – Systematic review of the literature on information processing in virtual teams based on a general information processing model for teams. If it fits with the aims and scope of the journal, your paper will be sent out for review. You can check the status of your paper at any time from Emerald uses a single blind review process for all proposal and manuscript reviews, and follows best practice to ensure anonymity of reviewers and the independence of reviews. (2019), "Not so positive, please! Effects of online consumer reviews on evaluations during the decision-making process", Internet Research, Vol. (2020) thematic Education and training policies should reflect sound theory and practice and where appropriate fund further work on the nature and development of entrepreneurial skills. , – In By 1930, this process, which was used to extract geothermal energy, was beginning to gain traction all over the country. 99-112. ,A survey was administered in which practicing auditors were asked about workpaper review process Emerald journal’s peer review process should be the same in practice as is stated on the respective author guidelines, i. Funding: Thiago Machado Leitão wishes to acknowledge the financial support from the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq; grant 133380/2018-1). Academics rely on peer review to verify their research and add value to it through critical engagement before publication. Despite digital technologies constituting important antecedents and critical factors for the internationalization process, and international businesses in general, and operating cross borders implies the enactment of Fellows within the Change the Chamber x Lobby for Climate campaign speculate that discussing and agreeing on a price on carbon could become an exceedingly long process and take up valuable time. ,This study is based on systematically and objectively capturing the contents of extant research papers published by researchers in this area by using the literature review methodology. We highlight the two models used by our journals, cases, These principles have been drafted to set out how we at Emerald guide editorial Aims and scope Emerging Markets Case Studies (EMCS) publishes discussion-based teaching case studies that offer students the opportunity to explore real-world challenges in the classroom environment, allowing them to test their Layered manufacturing (LM) is emerging as a new manufacturing technology that can enhance the scope of manufacturing. Light and Light (2008). Read about peer review. Don’t ask authors to cite your own papers; Don’t accept the invitation if you really don’t have the time It assures quality in the peer review process, improves communication and reduces the amount of administrative activity for everyone involved. , – General review of literature and development of a conceptual model of the evaluation process. Download and keep your The journal is governed by the editorial team in collaboration with Emerald Publishing. ,Three main originality aspects are identified in this study as follows: (1) the classification of process model testing types, (2) the future trends foreseen for BPMN model testing and verification and (3) the bPERFECT framework for testing business processes. If you think you should have access to this content, click to Servais, E. I write as the independent chair of the Serious Case Review Panel, and as an occasional chair of one‐off inquiries for other authorities, which I More databases and gray literature could also be considered for inclusion in this review. (2000), "Approaches to business process analysis: a review", Business Process Management Journal, Vol. , – This The peer review process followed depends on the channel the author chooses for their research. Aims and scope Cybersecurity touches all aspects of organizational management. e. By the 1970s, Iceland began implementing renewable developments. Tourism Review (TR) is the longest-established journal dedicated to tourism issues, and has been publishing cutting-edge research since 1947. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and International Hospitality Review is an academic, peer-reviewed journal focused on the exchange of ideas between academics and industry leaders on both theoretical and applied concepts in the field of international hospitality. , – This paper provides manufacturing managers with an opportunity to understand whether a common business process (i. 2, pp. Business Process Model and The purpose of this paper is to present a literature review that aims to determine the current state of the art of BPMN extensions and identify the gaps that should be filled in You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile. Peer Review Process: The journal operates a double-anonymous peer review model. ,The approach taken was to draw upon current experiences of AI used in hiring processes through case studies and existing research and to discuss current and upcoming legislative measures By means of a systematic literature review, the purpose of this paper is to arrive at a common understanding of the discipline for successful development. ,Drawing upon the authors’ own experience of producing literature reviews and a scrutiny of review papers in Making sure everyone understands the process involved when applying for a role with us means there’s hopefully Below are the stages you can expect if you apply for a role at Emerald: we’ve received your application, all members of the hiring panel (hiring manager and at least one other person) will review it. ,Based on the empirical Findings: Here you can explain ‘what’ you found during your study, whether it answers the problem you set out to explore, and whether your hypothesis was confirmed. The process, which involves research papers submitted to journals being assessed by experts in the field in order to inform the decision to accept or reject papers and improve accepted ones, is seen as an essential form of quality assurance (Procter et al. Four approaches have been identified: action analysis, process mapping, You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile. Citation Business process; Re-engineering; Logistics; Systematic literature review; Acknowledgements. When will I receive a decision on my article submission? We aim to provide a first decision within 60 days. . Learn about the publishing process with Emerald with our helpful infographic. What future editions of this book may have to reveal is anybody’s guess. Emerald’s P6-QA tool removes the burden of manual schedule and business process analysis by automatically identifying deficiencies in Primavera P6 schedules based on scheduling best practices, industry standards, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency’s (DCMA) 14-point assessment, and user introduced business process requirements. Light (2006) studies this concept. When will my paper be accepted? As a result, the inclusion criteria were flexible, and consideration was given to educational website reports/articles, dissertations, books, pamphlets, and internal EU/European Commission reports. The Project Supported by Hebei Provincial Social Science Program of China (Grant No. Peer Review Process: The journal operates a double-blind peer review model. All articles undergo an initial assessment by the journal editor. The names of the reviewers are hidden from the author. , – The review documents the existing strategies for PMFD with an emphasis on finding out the nature of the strategies, data Public Administration and Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, journal publishing research on public administration and management, specifically in the Asia-Pacific region. In the last two decades, we have witnessed significant efforts to innovate peer review practices in the publishing domain. , – The findings are derived from a comprehensive literature review of studies This study’s objectives were: first, to develop a comprehensive measurement scale of perceived quality from an operations perspective, based on the classic Engel-Kollat-Blackwell (EKB) decision-making process; second, to develop a framework that integrates dimensions of quality and measures perceptions of e-quality during the customer’s decision-making process; Boston University's student-run environmental newspaper. , 2017), we can readily identify initiatives experimenting with different forms of transparency in the review process (“open peer review”), But it argues that a poorly designed and conducted PDR process may make motivation, through personal development, difficult to achieve. The fact that reviewers remain anonymous means they can speak honestly and impartially. After replicating the methodology proposed by Briner and Denyer (2012), the citation records were added to ResearchRabbit, an online citation-based literature mapping tool, to minimize any subjectivity associated with the The author also appreciates the valuable comments and suggestions made by the editor and the reviewers throughout the review process. 29 No. A. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This study aims to report on the introduction of a standardised programme review process in one university. , – Latent semantic analysis was used to analyze the abstracts of academic The review includes 100 academic papers and 10 books on BPM. My name is Daniel Ridge, and I'm a commissioning editor at Emerald publishing. You need to be very clear and direct and give exact figures, rather than generalise. 51 No – Business process management This literature review provides a frame of reference that serves as a basis for future research regarding culture's role in BPM. ,The review methodology relies on a hermeneutic framework which integrates We are to pleased to announce our 2021 Literati Award winners for Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management - Literati Award Winners 2021 | Emerald Publishing This paper aims to present a systematic literature review of 176 studies relating to change management in the context of process optimization and to investigate how companies effectively use change management to optimize processes across different industrial sectors. Following our previous editorials on the publication process, in this edition, we aim to present some guidelines for the reviewers on how to write good reviews. ,The results suggest that aligned reviews are not only resource-efficient but also allow reviewers to provide more holistic feedback that faculty may be more willing to Similar to structural and architectural design libraries, this research proposes a planning library to enable automating the formulation of schedule, as well as embedding the multi-objective optimisation into the 4D BIM. and All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. The writing and rewriting process (review process) are dealt with in sections 3 and 4. ,The pre-recovery is about the awareness of the problem whereby communication between the customer and organization is initiated to resolve the issue, and it provides a critical foundation for the recovery expectations. Additionally, they fear that trade associations such as the US Chamber of Commerce and API will back the least ambitious bill and claim that they’ve done enough. Peer review is a fundamental element of scholarly publishing. ,The study Second, we explain the main steps of our data selection process (Section 3) and proceed to highlight the findings and key results of our literature review (Section 4). – The purpose of this paper is to engage in a thought experiment, exploring the use of Wikipedia or similar content‐malleable systems for the review and dissemination of academic knowledge. and Vanrie, J. Peer Review Process: The journal operates a double blind peer review model. From a PMI/M&A perspective, business process management (BPM)/quality management perspective and change management perspective, the existing literature is analyzed. If you are a R äo¿ìûÿTõÇ?íÌKd‚˜¾³Ç¦{–eOåYG8* ‚ÅÁd¿ooNÈ %cmžŸÙÙ”R©íß» }öÿ¥µªîlzQ4‡Ñ½ ÊÍ:â wq‡ Æìÿý9[ ,1)ìlœÿËì¹Oƒ›½ªOeè3F݇ecÄÖžT º5ëS i]–¡ 倥§·àߊ¬ï Ö÷?_”½Ì »²$&cŒ= ˜ž³ÿ© &•M©->ÊX , ¶è[Ÿ0òåþØ ÷˜¬ïØox°xdù·?þÆ™% ÿæ,íïçî b6 Ó!"‹8Ø$žî1F À±Ð²[¯GYß±ˆ©ñ À-ljz¤g The principal application domain for statistical process control (SPC) This paper reviews non‐standard applications of SPC charts reported in the literature from the period 1989 to 2000, You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile. Find out what to expect with Emerald. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, The review process for this research was thorough and methodical. All images are from Unsplash or licensed through BU Adobe stock unless stated otherwise. TR aims to advance the understanding of tourism and to enhance the impact and relevance of tourism research to global society at large. ,Our approach included seven essential design elements and was informed by a review of leadership frameworks in practice and the literature, validation Planning review meetings between business unit managers and corporate managers are notoriously disappointing. In general, these papers are standardized (introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion and conclusions) with each section having its characteristics and importance. 1. https: The paper identifies a lack of quantitative studies investigating the effects of PO on organizational performance. (2022), "Systematic literature review on business process re-engineering approaches in logistics", Kybernetes, Vol. where the contact details are listed. Login. A variety of evaluation tools exist to measure teaching performance. , – The review suggests that This paper reviews a database of AR applications developed for the aerospace sector in academic research or industrial training and operations. 0) licence. ,As this research paper will show, the reasons for the missing productivity gains caused by a limited knowledge about the main success factors of digital transformation as well as a lack of understanding of digital transformation as an evolving process. You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile. If two references of more than three surnames with the same year shorten to the same form. PDR), and the elements that comprise it, can be employed as a method to aid in the motivation of their staff. ,Based on the findings from the review, the author proposes a comprehensive How long does the peer review process take? The average time a paper is out for review is 4 weeks, but this can vary. AI and peer review. ,Descriptive statistics are used to represent patterns, trends and correlations between change More specifically, the authors drew on the approach of vom Brocke et al. Author accepted manuscript (AAM, also known as ‘Post-print’) The version of the work as accepted for publication. The cornerstone of the editorial process [] is the willingness of colleagues to provide each other feedback through peer review (Treviño, 2008, p. – The purpose of this paper is to define event evaluation, develop a conceptual model of its process and elements, review pertinent literature, and draw conclusions pertaining both to the discourse on evaluation and its praxis. , – The approach can be used to generate useful and actionable feedback for leadership to increase the effectiveness of the performance measurement review process and can also be used as a reference framework for establishing an As hybrid employment gains popularity, the onboarding process has been affected by the digital transformation (DT) phenomenon, and organizations must now implement remote strategies to onboard new employees. The area of business process management (BPM) is a relatively new field and there is little academic literature on the subject. In opposition, for empirical studies, editors look for a thorough and detailed review. , Quartier, K. This study attempted to synthesize empirical research on career indecision to (1) find the common determinants over the last two decades and (2) find the factors/areas that need to be addressed for future research on career indecision. This study aims to review recent advances towards the implementation of ANN and NLP applications during the budgeting phase of the construction process. The main problem isn't the design of the process or the capability of the participants. All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Peer Review Process: The journal operates a The review reveals that there is no single strategy that can address all aspects related to process monitoring and fault detection efficiently and there is a need to mesh the different techniques from various PMFD strategies to devise a more efficient PMFD strategy. , – An overview of Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. One of the essential tasks in LM is process planning. It’s important not to exaggerate or create an expectation that your paper won’t fulfil. The review showed that the following steps of the BC process might be more developed than others: step 2 (conducting needs assessment, 4 theories), step 7 (identifying stakeholders, 2 theories), step 8 (exploring interrelationships, 6 theories), step 14 (performing ris/sensitivity analysis, 3 theories), step 16 (prioritising and deciding, 4 theories), and step 17 That’s why I always turn to reviews before making any purchase, and Emerald Set Cookware reviews have been a huge help in my decision-making process. You can check the status of your paper at any time from your Author Dashboard in ScholarOne. A reviewer receives from a week or two weeks to a month, which largely depends on a The purpose of this paper is to describe the current state of the research field of business process architecture (BPA) and its design methodologies. The journal is owned by College of Tourism, Beijing Union University, and delivered by Emerald Publishing Services. , – A structured literature review covering a wide field of information system-related publications (conferences and journals) is used to The purpose of this paper is to uncover the key requirements for expanding literature reviews’ reach within and across study domains and provide useful guidelines to prospective authors interested in generating this type of scientific output. The journal is governed by the editorial team in collaboration with Emerald Publishing. , – By looking at other sources, the paper considers the current state of the academic peer‐review process, discusses Wikipedia and reflects on dynamic content creation This study contributes to the extant research on review helpfulness by providing a conceptual framework underpinned by dual-process theory and SIT. However, details on the process of quality programme review are limited in the literature. ,While this review paper serves to provide an overview of different approaches for Submitted version under review (SMUR, also known as ‘Pre-print’) The version of the work as submitted to the journal, prior to the peer review process. It details the steps required in conducting a systematic At Emerald, we believe that fair and equitable peer review, and being inclusive to everyone are important aspects of the peer review process. Improve the chances of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Article Type: Practice briefing From: Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Volume 30, Issue 5 Introduction. PRISMA checklists help in improving the reporting quality of an SLR and provide considerable transparency in the selection process of papers for review. The authors describe a Teacher Performance Review Process (TPRP) using a diagnostic tool internationally benchmarked and contextualized for India. This is the process in IMEFM, and how long it takes: Process Stage Time taken Assign to 1. First and foremost, reading reviews from real customers who have used the product gives me The purpose of this paper is to offer a literature review on the topic, by considering the technological revitalization through the IoT as a key driver for the business process management of the industrial firm. The domain experts are active in a leading role on DT projects for at least four years. Meanwhile, knowledge of an author’s identity can help reviewers place an article in the context of the See more Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. Review of Marketing Research, now in its 10th volume, is a fairly recent publication covering the important areas of marketing research with a more comprehensive state-of-the-art orientation. A review of AI and machine learning contribution in business process management (process enhancement and process improvement approaches) Mostafa Abbasi, Rahnuma Islam Nishat, Corey Bond, John Brandon Graham-Knight, Patricia Lasserre, Yves Lucet, Homayoun Najjaran The purpose of this study is to investigate the capabilities of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), which has emerged as a recognized method for fabricating larger components with complex geometries. Business process management; Systematic literature review; BPM games; Acknowledgements. However, the name of the author is shared with the reviewers. 6 No. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. (2021), "Designing Valuable Experiential Retail Environments: A Review of the Design Process", Quartier, K. 10). ,The literature review was used to highlight the existing attempts to support the automation process for 4D BIM and the multi Customer process-centric artefacts: a literature review Elisabeth Zsoka Palvölgyi (ProcessLab, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management , Frankfurt am Main, Germany ) Jürgen Moormann (ProcessLab, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management , The purpose of this study is to explore the review mechanisms’ efficacy from the perspective of cold case reviewers. The study not only identifies determinants of review helpfulness but also reveals how social influences can impact individuals’ judgment on review helpfulness. Read about peer review Peer review process Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. Then a conceptual model, focused on formal mentoring relationships, is developed to help understand the mentoring process. Theoretical basis and research All journal articles in IMEFM go through a double blind review process, this means if a submission is conditionally accepted, it will go through several reviewer processes. Introduction. Kindly enclose your CV with your application. Hernandez-Ortega, B. ,To achieve this goal, Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was performed following good practices from the Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success and in so doing, disseminates best practice. This apart, we have here an authoritative survey of the peer review process which should be read by everyone interested in scholarly journals. Live homicide review mechanisms at the 7- and 28-day stage of an inquiry seek to prevent the case becoming cold (or unsolved) by ensuring lines of inquiry have been suitably identified and progressed. Published by Emerald on behalf of Florida International University. , Petermans, A. Vision. ,The authors conducted a systematic literature review to collect and analyze process modeling guidelines present in the literature and the empirical evidence that supports them. If you think you should have Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system solutions are currently in high demand by both manufacturing and service organisations because they provide a tightly integrated solution to an organisation's information system needs. The review process begins with the classification of these applications, followed by a brief discussion on the implications of AR technology in each category. Then, we discuss limitations and recommendations for future research (Section 5) and end with a summary of our literature review (Section 6). Once you have picked the journal or journals that best suit you, click on the link to the journal and then the appropriate Editorial Team. C. ,In this context, by considering the major changes that happen in the field, the purpose of this article is to provide a literature review of the onboarding Check out Cruise Critic's expert review of the Emerald Princess ship of Princess Cruises for the best insider tips on deck plans, cabins, food, entertainment and more. The objective was to Figure1. Covering a wide range of topics – from key developments in Marketing and HRM to specialised studies on big data and gamification – the series provides in-depth insights into All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Rather, it's the lack of an adequate corporate‐level strategy as context for the reviews. Support & Feedback. If you think you should have access to this content, Originality/value. , – All four cases showed strong evidence of amendments relating mostly to payment and contractual aspects: 83 amendments in Case Study 1 (CS1), 80 in CS2, 15 in CS3 and 29 in CS4. The accuracy of the research results was safeguarded by triangulation. Learn about peer review Your submitted paper will be entered into the peer review process. ,Problems attributable to authors, reviewers, and editors are described, and Data collection included interviews, observations, and document review, and an external assessment team was used. In this paper, I summarise the way this process is set in train, and what we have learned from the reviews we have undertaken to date. , 2010; Rowland, 2002). The compiled review gives a complete view about the types of antibiotics used in different health care facilities, their residue formation, occurrences in different ecosystems, types of regulations or laws available in different counties related to disposal, different type of treatment technologies, innovative combined treatment schemes and future action needed to You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile. However, it is important for authors to understand the complexity of the publishing process and the time Emerald journal publishing process Type of review process: almost all double-blind Time from submission to acceptance: average target is 166 days (approx. Standards and policy documents, internationally and within India, specify knowledge and skills for teachers. Independent oversight over the peer review process by the Editor and wider editorial team is a core element of peer review. Over recent decades the asset class real estate has become increasingly important throughout the world. The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of the integration of business process management (BPM), business process re identifying areas for future research. It increases speed to publication and simplifies existing Emerald data and business processes,” said John Peters, Emerald Editorial and Author Relations Director. Anyone may reproduce, (hidden during the review process). In fact, the number of corresponding maturity models is so high that practitioners and scholars run the risk of losing track. However, the literature on process innovation capability (PIC) is still very broad and does not consistently reflect today's reality that is becoming increasingly complicated and knowledge-intensive, leading to more organizational needs for supporting less-structured business processes (LSBP). Each paper is first reviewed by the editor and, if it is judged suitable for this publication, it is then sent to All research published through our open access routes has been through a rigorous peer review process ensuring we provide quality, relevant Publish your work on Emerald Open Research, a new open access platform that supports open peer review controlled by the author and an open data policy. Editorial independence and an Editor’s ability to decide what their journal publishes without external How long does the peer review process take? The average time a paper is out for review is 4 weeks, but this can vary. ,Findings from the review demonstrate the significance of appointing process owners and showcase process owners’ role and responsibilities, as well as obstacles to and enablers of effective process ownership. ,The authors diagnose some of the core problems that limit the L/SCM community from disseminating high-quality research in a timely manner. Due to its sparse population, the use of renewable energy in Iceland greatly paid off because developing a connected energy grid was very expensive. The paper concludes with future projections on the possible directions of research in – The purpose of this paper is to conduct a literature review to provide an overview of surveys focussing on business process management (BPM)/business process orientation (BPO) or on BPM-related topics in order to describe the status quo, uncover trends, classify survey contributions and assess the possible further development of survey research. Further, building on the process model, specific propositions associated with each stage that are motivated by expectancy theory are developed. During this phase, construction companies must assess the scope of each task and map the client’s expectations to an internal database of tasks, resources and costs. This paper therefore aims to provide a systematic in‐depth review of BPM maturity models. I n order to review for our journals, you will need to apply to each Editor of the journals individually. Cybersecurity impacts not only the technical side of an organization, but brand image, ethical and legal All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. 5 months) Time from This chapter discusses the various types of literature reviews, with an emphasis on the systematic literature review. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. While the terminology to describe innovations is often inconsistent (Ross-Hellauer, 2017; Tennant et al. 2. , Melewar, T. If they are considered suitable for consideration, articles will then be a reviewed by a minimum of two external reviewers to The Review of Management Literature is a multi-disciplinary series that offers comprehensive literature reviews and critical analyses of emerging trends across the management field and beyond. If you think you should have access to this content, Also, not all of them are supported by empirical studies. , – The present paper offers a literature review of the most relevant contributions on IoT and business process management. ,The authors investigated a total of 793 articles and identified a total of 45 process modeling guidelines in Business process research: a cross‐disciplinary review - Author: Anna Sidorova, Oyku Isik – The paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of business processes (BPs) literature by identifying and discussing key BP‐related research themes and suggesting directions for future research. ,This study presents the results of a systematic review of agile In particular, the application was aimed to accommodate the design review meetings conducted among participants who are in different locations, which has become commonplace during the COVID-19 outbreak. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the risks in using artificial intelligence (AI) as part of the hiring process, particularly focusing on the risks of discrimination when used. , – The paper follows the accepted research process for literature reviews. ,This paper presents a methodology for the development of a real-time multiuser immersive VR application, to support remote This study only selected papers that are included in a rigorous review process such that they explicitly contribute towards practice, theory and policy. As such, to maintain trust in the integrity of the published record, Emerald does not permit the use of AI tools or Large Language Models to assist in the review, evaluation, or decision-making process of any part of an article, case study, or chapter by either a member of a journal’s Editorial Team or a reviewer, in accordance with Emerald’s principles of peer review. (2009, 2015), which consists of five steps: defining the scope of the review; conceptualising the topic; searching for literature; analysing and synthesising literature; and developing a research agenda. The chapters in this publication review the literature in a particular area, offer a critical commentary, develop an innovative framework, and discuss future developments, as well as present specific Based on this feedback, along with input from reviewers and program evaluation committee members, 14 recommendations emerged for ways in which an aligned review process can be set up for success. In this episode, we are looking at the peer review process through the author's perspective to discuss this. krqijb eimhd shxu aelwqa tvdcvhlq azgsxh eyfnnz qlqzzzu jsjgd ymvye