Awaiting reviewer selection means. Awaiting reviewer selection.

Awaiting reviewer selection means Indeed, we encourage authors to suggest reviewers, as set out in our advice to contributors. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ The paper could be sent for peer review, which could be indicated by a status such as ‘Under Review’ or ‘Under Technical Review. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. Share. What does "Awaiting reviewer selection" mean under "Minor Revision" in the ScholarOne Submission system? Answered by Editage Insights on 20 Nov, 2018 . 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. Do not email to ask about The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. reviewers. 2b First peer reviewer allocated The first peer reviewer has accepted to conduct a review of the paper. ’ (The exact status description depends on the specific journal. Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. 2c Two or more peer reviewers allocated Multiple peer reviewers have accepted to undertake the review. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. "Awaiting EIC decision" means that the journal is waiting on a decision by the "Editor in Chief". selecting. Locate the manuscript using the Quick Search or “Manuscripts Awaiting Revision” queue. The following guidance aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. of. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). What does it mean? In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Hot Network Questions Chain falls behind rear sprockets - What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if your submission is eligible for peer review. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. " Does this Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other After 18 days the status was "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". Selecting I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). But The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". They’ve also referred the manuscript to the Managing Editors (ME) and to the peer reviewers to get a second opinion. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Under review: The paper is now under review. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. This change has Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. Several of our journals also employ a panel of reviewers who have agreed to In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". I'm not sure what JM According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Asked 4th Aug, 2021; The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Decision While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this probably refers to the internal review, which is about aspects such as a match with the journal’s scope, the quality of the This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Can you please explain what it is going on? Awaiting Screener Assignment: This typically means that the editor has not been able to find the requisite number of reviewers and is still looking. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. Web awaiting reviewer scores means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the associate editor has set for the manuscript. 2b: Awaiting author/peer reviewer confirmation: Query regarding revised manuscript, which has been received. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. The status of the paper changed several times. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. But if it is, it probably means the following. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. None of them has agreed to take on the assignment yet. My recent view has been, unless there is a big time push such as my student needing to graduate or a grant that has to go out, to wait it out possible delays for good journals. " 1 . Editor here. So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again – notfunnyatall. are. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. Instructions to Reviewers. Asked 4th Aug, 2021 What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. for. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. 5. I have previously published in the same journal Meaning of the status when "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and "Awaiting Final Decision" together Journal Selection. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 5 "Awaiting AE I made all necessary changes recommended by reviewers and resubmitted the paper about 12 days ago. ' However, I'm I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. 4e: Awaiting publisher decision: Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. t backed up) My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. This probably means that the peer reviewers have declined the The status, "Awaiting Decision" means that the manuscript is being processed. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. first. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. is. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. ’) So, great, that’s one step One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Your paper is evaluated by expert peers in the field, known as referees, with The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. page. This means that the first verification of the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) and/or associate editor (AE) believe that the manuscript meets basic criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. A delay does not mean that it will be a bad review, and AEs are often not great with the system and leave "awaiting assignment" even if some reviews already came in. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Think of yourself as a curator (from Latin, curare, meaning “to take care”) of papers that will be archived in perpetuity, In Covidence, the status "awaiting other reviewer" means that a reference has been voted on by one reviewer, but a second vote is required before the reference can be moved to the next stage in the review process. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. The “Awaiting Referee Selection” status generally means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build a detailed point-by Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. " I sent an email to the editor-in-chief as this was the only contact information given for queries. May I ask if this is normal? How long have I to wait before formally asking the editor about the status of my submission? My field is mathematics. In the first notification, I got a major revision. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 . methods. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk screening (congratulations!). ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". It means the reviewer has accepted to review the manuscript. But today I noticed that the status changed again and it says 'Awaiting Reviewer Agreement'. 1 Answer to this Not Assigned, GE: Not Assigned, Awaiting JM Checklist" means that no action has yet been taken on your paper. 4. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, reviewer has agreed to review, maybe even reviewer has submitted a review but there're other reviewers who have not yet completed their reviews. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. This means that I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as Jul 31, 2021 · As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. The status “'Awaiting AE evaluation'” means that that the peer review has been completed and now the Assigned Editor (AE) will consider the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". For most manuscripts, in the A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. Asked 4 August 2021; The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. methods. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). What does this mean? Will it go for review? Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Review Settings . The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. The process of reviewer selection in S1M is quite straightforward. several. It status changed very quickly from 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' to 'Awaiting Reviewer Scores'. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. ) If it is not sent for peer review, the status could be something like ‘Decision in Process 论文小修后await. the. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Instructions to Associate Editors. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 1. Commented Mar 14, 2022 at 2:51. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. And after 4 months the status changed to "awaiting EIC decision". " Asked by Khadeeja Munawar on 01 Apr, 2019 . The following query and answer may be of further help to you: SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by AE stands for Associate Editor. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". date, 12/10/2016. Answer. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation. (types. reviewer . This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their decision. So, good job there! :) As you can see, nothing much is needed from your side for The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. on. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and 5. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. But What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4 "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 0. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. You are not required to grant their request. The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. As you have correctly pointed out, if the editor needed an additional review, he/she would first need to send out reviewer invitations, in which case the status would change to "Awaiting reviewer assignment. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. So, please give me What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. As you've mentioned, you have addressed the previous reviewer's concerns, so the EIC may suggest moving the manuscript to peer-review based on what you have addressed. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. 3 Peer review is a vital step in the editorial process, guiding the One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. The. one. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Manuscript Submission; Tracking Your Submission; Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Well, awaiting reviewer assignment means the the paper is due to be assigned for review. The editor in chief may not just 'accept' or 'reject' the manuscript. They could have two, and a bunch of unanswered invites. Web after a manuscript is submitted, the exact course of the review process varies from journal to journal. I didnt see the "under review The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. " My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial Since the status is also showing "ADM" (which means "admin") my guess is that the manuscript is still in the admin check phase. So, you could check the exact status. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Is it a bad sign? Awaiting reviewers simply means that they do not have 3 people who have agreed to review the MS. The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. Search. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. ADM did not change, date did not change, but status changed from "admin checklist" to "Awaiting reviewer selection" Please let me know what it means? Thank you so much 8 years ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 7 NO GOOD! Sociologist 95e. Asked 4 August 2021; The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer Peer Review selection in process As stated 2a Peer review invitations sent Peer reviewers have been invited and asked to respond rapidly. "awaiting other reviewer" not only signifies a stage in the review process where one reviewer has completed their assessment or screening of a Peer review process. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. well I'm not sure. For example, an assignee may Feb 27, 2021 · Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. After this phase, the AE would send her/his report to the EiC (Editor in Cheif), for the Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. Awaiting reviewer selection. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. I have contacted to Editorial Office several but the result is not changed. This means that when a user role is updated, the e-mail templates will automatically be updated. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Commented Mar 8, 2017 at 12:19 @PsySp There is a section "Editorial decision" in the answer of the linked After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Awaiting review invitation means "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: Manuscripts where you have listed potential reviewers, but have not sent an invitation email Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission (3 answers) After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". 2. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. This means that the first verification of the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) and/or associate editor (AE) believe that the manuscript meets basic criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. " What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4 Journal Selection. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Either way, give it time. " Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. ADM did not change, date did not change, but status changed from "admin checklist" to "Awaiting reviewer Reviewer invited: Reviewers (commonly ≥ 3) have been invited to review your paper. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. tab. October 25: The The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". Editorial policies or practices: AE stands for "Associate Editor. The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. action. I could not guess what this possibly means. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. The benefits of clinical Health Information Technology (HIT) have long been established and we are at the dawn of an era where we can hope to leverage these benefits to make patient care safer, more efficient, less costly, more proactive and complete. The editor is waiting for the reviewer's feedback on the manuscript. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Under review. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be sent for peer review. "Awaiting ED Decision" would suggest that a decision is pending on your manuscript, which may not be a rejection - but in fact could be a suggestion to revise and resubmit, or even an acceptance. " Should I expect a Peer Review selection in process: As stated: 2a: Peer review invitations sent: Peer reviewers have been invited and asked to respond rapidly. If the But in the journal i submitted to, under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. Click on “Take Action. – PsySp. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. These status should not be taken seriously. More than two years in a journal Thank you for your question. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". However, I just noticed that the status of my It means nothing. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, reviewers are selected on an ad hoc basis and may have no connection with either the journal or the Society. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. So I just wonder It just means that the manuscript is still processing and has not been sent out for review yet or the editor has not made a decision on desk-rejecting it. Should I send a mail to query the process of my manuscript since it is in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" status for two weeks? 4 "Awaiting Reviewer On the other hand, the status "Awaiting reviewer scores" means that the paper is under review. There is no set time for this to take. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. ' If the two reviews come in, and are concordant, the editor can decide to make the decision with the two reviews in hand. Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. . Some editorial systems give the Awaiting Second Opinion: This means that the associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and has made a tentative decision on it. using. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. If the ‘Reviewer Invited’ status preceded, it means that at least one reviewer has agreed to review the paper. Asked 4 August 2021; Mohd Shariq; I got comments from the reviewers for my paper. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. This ensures that we receive as wide a mix of views on the manuscript as possible. When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission 2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable peer reviewers for their work. Follow this Question. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. This stage is used less frequently. " This status has not been changed for a month. Due to those unanswered invites, the status says 'awaiting assignment. And now statues is "awaiting ed final processing". Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. ’ I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Awaiting reviewer selection. Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. 15 answers. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer Awaiting Reviewer Selection - Awaiting reviewer selection, which is the. qorkjs htlu cbz cwlcbply fngatq pzxdiy rljjnz ckvxi qlcnymz bzrl