Awaiting reviewer selection for long time sample. ; But the Statute is very generous to Commissioners.

Awaiting reviewer selection for long time sample Now I want to submit my manuscript to another journal, but it would be a duplicate submission in this situation. To summarize the comments: as long as it takes. What does this mean? Will it go for review? Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 5 months with no change in status. 18 submitted 2022 Status 3: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 11. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. During this time, the editor looks for Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? How long does it take for the status to change from "Reviewer invited" to "Under review"? Answered by Editage Insights on 07 Nov, 2019 . I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Blog approval time - Awaiting for review How long does it take to get an under review blog approved? in Questions about SAP Websites 2023 Mar 26; Blog Post not yet posted for Public. Given the times, waiting 15 I have submitted a manuscript to a pediatrics-related journal. e. Among one month, the status stays "Awaiting Referee Reports" without handling by editor. The difference between "reviewer invited" and "under review" is simply that in the second case, at least one invited reviewer has agreed to review it. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are I submitted a paper to some journal. 2023. Within a couple of days the status changed to "assigning for review". After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 2. Awaiting ME That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. The bad sign stems from the fact that it really shouldn't take seven months to find a reviewer. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Popular Articles. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the editor is in the process I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". 22 Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. However, today, I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). If accepted, the paper is sent to production. 3 Status 7: Assigned to Editor 12. Asked 1 June The study found that AI reduced reviewer selection time by longitudinal studies will be conducted to assess the long-term impact of AI-assisted reviewer selection on peer-review quality, publication outcomes, and citation rates. Some journals also allow authors to recommend peer reviewers. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". In general, editors and journals may want more than you to have a quick decision back to you, as the journal indices can be affected, which in turn may affect authors selecting the journal, and, 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision Finding a reviewer takes a really long time, huh~ hh How long does the formal review process take? Aptom 2022-11-20 2022. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to Anybody know how long it should take a journal to assign reviewers to an article? I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". For more experienced authors, if you’re a reluctant reviewer who doesn’t respond in time, and may not submit review reports on time, you may not expect that others will do otherwise for you. 6. Skip to My manuscript suddenly went from "Awaiting Final Decision" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" what do you think happened there? [duplicate] Ask Question Asked 2 years, 3 months ago. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). What Skip to main content My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". 23 Status 6: Awaiting AE Make Decision 12. If that is the case, The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. Reviewer assignments (i. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. They may have reached out to potential reviewers and may be awaiting a response. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. 努力努力最努力 2022-07-04 Does "awaiting reviewer My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. Is this normal or should I be worried? I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Once you have done this, submit your article through the ScholarOne, RAE’s submission management system. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Now it is almost 3 weeks. Just want to know what you think based on I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'. There is no set time for this to take. t backed up) Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. Hi. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a week. Okay, it has been sent for review again. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. Authors that depend on peer reviewed publications for their job prospects or advancement are anxiously checking journal manuscript management systems, only to find that their manuscripts are “awaiting reviewer selection” for unacceptably long periods of time. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. 3 Peer review is a vital step in the editorial process, guiding the EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. So, on average, you and your co-authors should collectively provide a similar number of reviews. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission 2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable peer reviewers for their work. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Editor here. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. The statute here allows a choice. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. It has been 1. – A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). R: Before submitting an article, check the norms available in the RAE Guidelines, in the Author Section. Does it mean the paper has been sent for peer review or is it still eligible for desk rejection? Please advise. The acceptance for IEEE Signal Processing Letters did not take much time for me. Sorry! nothing found for. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Awaiting Reviewer Scores Reviewer Misconduct As a volunteer, IEEE appreciates your time and contributions to the research in your field. To check the status of your submission in o 25 days ago, i submitted a paper to a high-profile journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. After that communication with the editor, neither the editor nor the handling editor return My paper underwent a revision. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. The average review period of the target journal that I submitted is two weeks, and it usually takes about a month to get the first revision. 23 Status 5: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. in Hindawi publisher. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" ; for 15 how long should you now wait well I'm not sure. I submitted one paper to American Journal of Industrial and Business Management two months ago, and I received the review report If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. Role of the reviewer. 21, awaiting AE decision. Things have only become worse in the pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Indeed, we encourage authors to suggest reviewers, as set out in our advice to contributors. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. These status should not be taken seriously. " Required Reviews Complete My manuscript, which I sumbit to a journal of Sage in September 2022, passed the Editor stage and was taken for peer review. Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. ; The statute of De Nederlandsche Bank is currently being amended. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. The status of the paper changed several times. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. NET in Insert / Edit code sample Re: [feedback] VB. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". This change A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. So your manuscript is one step closer to a final decision. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. 6. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. ” Final thoughts. The day after the submission though, the two statuses of ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Decision’ were displayed together. I'm an Assistant Professor and I get far more review requests than I could ever handle, at the same time that my institutional service responsibilities are ramping up (fewer T-T profs around my For more experienced authors, if you’re a reluctant reviewer who doesn’t respond in time, and may not submit review reports on time, you may not expect that others will do otherwise for you. Is long period a good or bad sign? I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. Here are some suggestions for additional potential colleagues who would be in a position to provide suitable peer review. I submitted a manuscript to a journal in December of 2021. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. @Coder: When it comes to IEEE or Elsevier, 15 days is not a long time at all (unless you are communicating with journals that come under Letters). The AE is not solely employed by IEEE, but also has a faculty position (usually) and other obligations. in Questions about SAP Websites 2023 Feb 20; VB. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 I just thought after all reviewer scores, I will disagree. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. NET in The statute “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” lasted for more than one year. Second, expand future studies to include more extensive, more diverse samples encompassing a broader Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. How long I should wait for the final verdict? I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. I have previously published in the same journal A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. However, I definitely remember the last two: AE stands for "Associate Editor. ; The Statute of Uses three centuries after the Statutes of . I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. This is the way to Each reviewer will have approximately 4-6 weeks for their review. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. . My manuscript had earlier gone through English proofreading by a professional vendor. – Parnian. When i have contacted the editorial office, they 2. The journal review process. 4. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is One reason why this stage is taking long could be that the journal editor is having a tough time finding suitable peer reviewers. It means nothing. Now this is the fourth month and the status is still the same. Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. ” It has been almost 2 months now. ; The statute defined equality of all before the law. After 11 months, the referee evaluation was finalised. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. What does this mean? If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. but it's taking some time to finalize the reviewers. These reviewer guidelines provide insight into the peer review process with an emphasis on information reviewers need to know to conduct and complete their recommendation. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" The overall timeframe, 2 weeks from submission to decision, is at the long end of what we'd like for a reject without review (we try to turn papers around quickly), but it's not uncommon. 6 answers. ; But the Statute is very generous to Commissioners. The status of my submission changed from "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision" on November 8 and it has been constant since then. Some editorial systems give the For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . What does it mean for SAGE SSCI awaiting reviewer assignment after I submitted my revised verision? I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. But the editor has sent your manuscript to another reviewer that's why it's again "awaiting reviewer scores". It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. You could wait up to a month before thinking of sending a polite reminder. Cite. As the Editor has not responded to an email, I would contact the Editorial Office (or journal Admin Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. This rather ambiguous move on to a stage such as “Awaiting Recommendation” and/or “Awaiting Decision” and it generally won’t be long before a decision is sent to • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Thank you for your time. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. But there is still no response. One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. thanks a lot. Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. The following guidance aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Does it mean the work will be rejected? These are relatively simple. They tried on their own, failed, then asked you for help after two months (kind of a long time, but not a priori unreasonable). The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. Hello, I would like to ask, if the status of your submission is "awaiting reviewer selection," how long does it usually take to receive a review notification? Thank you. Some do it in time, some start a day before the deadline, some need a number of reminders after the deadline, Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Sincerely, [Your name]. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the Why the editor is taking time to decide? View. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. After three months I contacted the editor and s/he informed me that the review is still going on. Still the status is same. I would like to inquire about the status of our submitted manuscript since it has now been [insert the amount of time that has passed]. Although it's frustrating, your manuscript is probably one of many they are responsible for and they have their own stuff going on. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Since it has been about a month since the Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? Question. View. However, I submitted the paper at the end of May and the status is still “under review. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Do not email to ask about For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. 5 months? It is a long time since you have submitted your paper to the journal. ; The statute also benefits Members of this House. Your manuscript has cleared desk screening and is being sent for peer review – that’s one step/obstacle crossed. Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is 1. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. If the paper was sent back for revision, the As long as you do it in a professional manner, space your requests appropriately over time and are reasonable about timelines, then there shouldn't be a reason for journal staff to react negatively about this. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 2) Whatever electronic system is conveying to you the message "awaiting reviewer Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, scope match, and adherence to the journal I have submitted a manuscript to IOP journal. It is also important to pay attention to the rules for Format and Citations and References. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for I contacted the journal several times, but there was no reply. The people that you suggested somehow didn't pan out, and they reacted badly to that, putting your work on some sort of long-term queue. In general, editors and journals may want more than you to have a quick decision back to you, as the journal indices can be affected, which in turn may affect authors Some editors keep a paper for a long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision. Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. Eight to nine months is very long response time for a So, we have made some edits/assumptions. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? If I don't hear from them with a final decision within the next two months I decide to withdraw the paper as it seems that the whole process will take too long and either the journal or the reviewer(s) is not very professional. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". 4 The publishing time is too long, starting from 3 months. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status 1. As 3 months have past after re Status 3: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 11. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. However, I just noticed that the status of my The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. 15-6. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications Reviewers Guidelines. I think it seems a long time for this step. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. It has been over two months, but the status is still displayed as I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the manuscript to another journal”. I checked the status now: Reviewer 1 has already finished review in the end of May, and reviewer 2 approved it in It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. If you have this option and have peer reviewers in mind, you can put in this recommendation as it will help expedite the peer review process. Why Review a Paper? Each paper you submit generates about 3 reviews. kydc hsnbrdl oobs njemzcs uau mymh scjrivy vylaud cnzcp bvw