Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review If you have reviewed other articles for this publication in the past, the timeliness and quality of Note: See the Publons Credit for Completed Reviews section for information about how to add previously completed reviews to your Publons record. My manuscript status changed from ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation,’ but the same day, it went back to ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores. “Awaiting SE Recommendation” means that it went to a Section Editor (SE) of the journal for checking the match with that section of the journal. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". 10 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Giod! Oh, if that is true then what does "under review" mean? Really? I don't think so. 6. This subreddit is for all those interested in working for the United States federal government. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that it has been sent out for peer review and peer reviewers are in the process of reviewing the paper. Now it is almost 3 weeks. If this Under Review Awaiting Reviewer Scores Awaiting TE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting SE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting EIC Decision Reject && Resubmit Reviewer Comments: There were a total of 35 comments from four reviewers and the Technical Editor (TE). For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. If it is sent out to reviewers, then the status changes to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Also be available to answer questions and explain how to find answers if the question has stumped you. Thanks though. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Meaning of an immediate change (after submission) to Awaiting AE Recommendation. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? It’s not entirely clear by your query whether these were the statuses before you submitted the revised paper or after. Related reading: What does a change from "awaiting editorial decision" back to "under review" mean? If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. Jim Jim. I didnt see the "under review Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". The status of the paper changed several times. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, scope match, and adherence to the journal I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. ’ What this means is that your manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review comments/opinions are presently awaited. For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". If you can, be on hand to talk through the piece of homework. Associate ORCID iD The Score Sheet may now be configured to ask for the Reviewer’s ORCID iD. However, I definitely remember the last two: Awaiting reviewer scores. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). ’ After a week, it changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment. 我可以肯定的是不一样: 我曾经投稿Oxford press期刊, 先是under review,经过一月有余,变为Awaiting Reviewer Scores ,然后很快(4天后)给出审稿意见. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? If it has been "under review" for some time, then yes - the external reviewers are done. But the editor, for some reason, e. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. Typically, these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after (‘Revision’). ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. Awaiting Editor Decision Under review --> some journals seem to use this for every stage of peer review. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. 15-6. In my opinion, this is probably what has happened to your paper, which is why the status has changed to "Awaiting reviewer invitation. Don't mean to be mean, but you are probably overthinking this. When you review a paper you read a manuscript critically, and start to realize potential criticisms reviewers might have of your future papers. MS > JFE 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Reply. From a purely grammatical perspective there’s not much difference between the two terms. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. Yesterday I checked the paper and the status had changed to “awaiting final decision”. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. zhyun 2023-06-08 It may be because there are conflicting opinions in the current review or the editor believes that there Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. t backed up) Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Thanks. I think so. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). Sometimes, the editor, after going I submitted my paper to one of the IEEE Transactions journals. What does this mean? Will it go for review? However, in this case, “Under Review” means that the paper was picked up for an initial review of the quality of the paper and of a match with the journal’s scope. I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. So based on what you say, and I hope I'm wrong, but it looks like For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Answered August 14, 2017 - Outreach Specialist (Former Employee) - Telehealth Solutions. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Answered August 14, 2017 - Outreach Specialist (Former Employee) - Telehealth Solutions. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Can you confirm? Edit: in my case, it is for a revised paper. However, the I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. . Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. 5. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". If you didn't see "under review", then the editor is making a decision without consulting reviewers, which is usually a bad sign. But today suddenly the status changed back to Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Under Review and Under consider: Under Review is Recruiting is reviewing your application and under consideration is the next step with the manager of Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. Under Review and Under consider: Under Review is Recruiting is reviewing your application and under consideration is the next step with the manager of Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Meaning of awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Everybody's Job Market Rumors (XJMR) | Job Market Wiki Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. AE Overdue Tasks; Reviewer Overdue Score; Overdue Reviewer Response ; Long-Standing Papers; You can access manuscripts in each peer review status by clicking on the status queue title. Not sure if the The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). I’m not able to meet my supervisor at the moment as they are away. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Is that the only reason the date changes? I have heard that if the editor accesses the reviewers coments and when a reviewer send his comments the date changes also. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Then there is an Editor In Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. 2023. I have sent three emails to the editor, and the first time, the editor gave a vague reply, saying that it is still under review and we have to wait. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned 2023. It means it is under review by another Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I My paper has been on second round of revision (R&R) with this journal for 4 months, when I sent an email to ask for what is going on, I just saw the status changed from awaiting reviewer scores to reviewer selection under way. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Mega Nav. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Doing so is considered a breach of They can perform any number of tasks depending on the journals specific workflow, including finding and managing the review process, making recommendations and/or decisions. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". g. Really? I don't think so. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. In reality, however, it is quite normal for invited I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. Now, the status is Awaiting EIC Decision. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Scores This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. Journals refer to this role as many things depending on their business model. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". " This status has not been changed for a month. Next, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation and remained so for a week. I have naturally seen the status "under review" when the manuscript goes to the process review for others journals. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? Assign Reviewers; Awaiting Reviewer Scores; Overdue Reviewer Scores; AE Make Recommendation; Overdue Tasks. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting In an ideal world, enough of the invited reviewers will agree to review and your manuscript will move on to the next stage. ’ The following day, it changed back again to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation. I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Everybody's Job Market Rumors (XJMR) | Job Market Wiki Thread: 0 Goods vs 0 No Goods; Home » Economics » Research / Journals "Under Review" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Economist e7d1. Economist acf3. If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. It seems to me that the processing at all levels My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Okay, it has been sent for review again. If the status is listed as Under Review it may still be desk rejected, but if it changes to Awaiting Reviewer Selection or Awaiting Reviewer Scores it has passed desk review, although it can still then be rejected on the basis of reviewer reports. e. Awaiting Reviewer Score(s) in ScholarOne. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? Meaning of double statuses Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ This status is known by different names with different journals, including ‘Under review’ and ‘Awaiting technical scores. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. Loading Tour The journal uses ScholarOne Manuscripts for online submission. Visit Stack Exchange. It took 10 days to go from Under Review to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Still the status is same. So, if you mean these are the statuses after submitting the revised paper After ten more days i. 10 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Giod! Economist acf3 ^ Thanks. Your paper is evaluated by expert peers in the field, known as referees, with a publication decision made by the journal editors. The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. Answer: The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any response from them. 9. However, I just noticed that the status of my Awaiting Reviewer Score(s) in ScholarOne. Editors (Ed. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Download . xml Templates Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. Does anyone have any idea why In MS, what is the difference between "Under Review" and "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" after going through "Awaiting AE Assignment"? 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 0dda. The Decision is Communicated. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. It means that the peer review is over, taking about two months, and the peer reviewer recommendations are awaited on the paper. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. The number next to each status queue title These are relatively simple. What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. It may be that one journal uses the term “in review” and another the term “under review”, both to signify the same thing: that your Awaiting Reviewer Scores Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. Gain privileged insight into state-of-the-art in research, and have a say in what is published and what is rejected. I sent a manuscript almost 1 month ago to a journal and the status was changed to " awaiting approval" without under review. a) Is it My supervisor and I are currently awaiting the outcome of a paper we submitted a few months ago. It seems that the Associate . But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it. Follow answered Jun 18, 2012 at 2:47. 6. Then, the status remained unchanged for three weeks. 4k 10 10 gold badges 76 76 silver badges 129 129 bronze badges. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Improve this answer. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Peer Review in Progress. After ten more days i. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Share. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor will have to look for new reviewers and send out invitations all over again. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor will have to look for new reviewers and send out invitations all over again. Some reviewers will As a reviewer, you are obligated to maintain the confidentiality of both the paper you are reviewing and also of your review. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Under review means the AE is currently evaluating whether the paper is worth sending out for review. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. It may be set to required or optional for the Reviewer to answer. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was ‘Under review. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. e around two months from the submission date, I got a mail stating "I have received all the required reviews, which I will now evaluate before making a decision" and the status changed to "Ready for Decision". This is why Antonin Scalia's death was such a great loss, who is left to tell people to just read the goddamn words. It means its under review. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. What At this stage, the manuscript is still under review, awaiting the feedback of the reviewer(s). If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision. Reviewer A and the TE had slightly sharp comments. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. But my question is as below. I'm relatively new to publishing and I get I'm probably overthinking this. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. But today suddenly the status changed back to I submitted a paper to some journal. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. 10 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 45b2. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Stack Exchange Network . ’ This must be a journal I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. AE stands for "Associate Editor. Also, related to one of Marcus' points above, if we have recieved two reviews, the system updates to 'Reviews Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will change to "under review. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. Post Send Post » Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. You are invited to be one of at least two independent, qualified reviewers who will evaluate this article. If the reviewers respond that they will review your manuscript, the status will change to "Under Review". 21, awaiting AE decision. Improve this question. Please note that other statuses may My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Whats the difference? Just had a manuscript make this change. It is my very first paper (co-authored) so this process is quite new to me. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. On the last step I’ve seen it stay for months because some DEs are sitting on the paper. " Good luck! Answered by Editage This is quite simple. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: One uses under review when the purpose is to critically scrutinize events- for example to find fault or establish innocence. ’ Does this mean that it has not been sent for review? Thank you. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. 33. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. ), Assistant Editor (AE), Section Editors (SE) are a few of the more common ones. ’ Please help me understand these status changes. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. What can this mean? The platform is The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. Skip to main content. What does this mean? Please help. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. I have a paper that was under review with one of Wiley's journals. So, the reviewers will share their comments with the Associate Editor (AE) along with their recommendations for the paper – whether (or not) they believe the paper has merit and should therefore be considered I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. When you submit a research manuscript for peer review, the journal may report the status of the review as “in review” or “under review”. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. ’ Just a few hours later, another ADM was assigned, but the status is the same. I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. My paper underwent a revision. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. What does this status mean? I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Add a • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. The paper received an R&R last summer and a revised version was provided. Log In/Register. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. However, a strange observation is that I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. The manuscript status was first displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. I've recently contacted the editor about the status of the manuscript on 8-Apr-2019 and he replied that he is waiting for an overdue review, the the reviewer wa chased on 5-Apr-2019. Since the application process itself is often nothing short of herculean and time-consuming to boot, this place is meant to serve as a I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. --我的理解是: under review是审稿的前面阶段, Awaiting Reviewer Scores 是审稿的后面阶段,表示审稿即将结束. (Non-paper What does awaiting reviewers reply mean? And how long does it take. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. If the Reviewer is logged in, it will Our entire research enterprise would stop functioning without Reviewers. When should you say “yes” and when should you I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; The system only updated to 'Under Review' when two reviewers have BOTH accepted to review the paper. How long I should wait for the final I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. Most likely this doesn't reflect positive response, if it changed directly from under review or awaiting reviewers score to awaiting editor decision. 5 months with no change in status. Under review means the AE has it but it is not yet sent out for reviewer scores. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Reviewer assignments (i. The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Now, this status has remained for 18 days. awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting DE decision. Also, It has been 1. What does it mean that You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. It's not necessarily the same as 'under review' and 'awaiting reviewer scores'. The status has been changed to Awaiting Reviewer Scores in the same week I created the submission. Articles passing successfully through the pre-refereeing stage then begin formal peer review. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. Role of the Editor . Upon submission, Editors will assess the general suitability of your paper for the It has been six months and it is still "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". I recently submitted a manuscript to a reputed computer science (CS) journal that follows the ScholarOne workflow system. Will wait for the result. Please let me know the decision you have received. After two more days the status changed to "Under Review. If that is the case, I submitted a paper to some journal. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Yes, but the question is under review by whom. So, keep up your hope and wait for the status to change to "Under review. Role of the journal editor. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. So what is the status if it is sent to referees? 4 years ago # QUOTE 3 Good 0 No Giod! Economist I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". " I am not able to understand the status of my paper. IEEE Policy on Reviewers Using AI: Information or content contained in or about a manuscript under review shall not be processed through a public platform (directly or indirectly) for AI generation of text for a review. Probably a desk reject from the AE that may have been slowed due to holidays. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned their review, therefore completed the Reviewer Score task. Mental Health then the EIC would be the one to evaluate the manuscript. You have been invited to review this article based on your knowledge and expertise. There have been no replies for the second and third times. " Once the reviewer accepts the invitation, the status will change to "Under review" once again. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Research papers and reviews submitted for publication in the majority of IOP journals are sent to two independent referees who are asked to report on the quality, scientific rigour, novelty, significance to the field, and presentation. I noticed that the status of my paper changed immediately to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ without being ‘Under Review. What does this mean? Reviews were completed and back to the Editor? 10 years ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Giod! Economist b1cc. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 9 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Reply. This process continues until The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has Meaning of the Under Review status in the ScholarOne system Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". How long I should wait for the final verdict? The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making a decision. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; Share. Skip to main content Ask a Question. ’ After that, it has been ‘Under Review’ for eight weeks. jnveixxo jystwed pzvsb gejb xwpsci lkf nwd hydt siq thdgp